Submission should capture the information the WISE panel actually uses.

This mock call form now includes the reviewer-facing fields from the handbook flow: scientific case, WISE relevance, sustainability significance, applicant context, deductible time, and the publication limits used in evaluation.

Bidding, competence, and conflict declarations before allocationOne rapporteur plus two reviewers per proposalPanel ranking with funded and reserve bucketsConflicts, competence, and rankings tracked per reviewer

Call for proposals

The applicant form is now closer to a real WISE call rather than a generic proposal shell.

It is still a mock environment, but the submitted fields now align better with how reviewers need to assess merit, feasibility, sustainability, and relevance.

Application form

Draft and submit actions still write to the shared persisted mock-call state.

Project titleApplicant nameEmailTrackApplicant genderAcademic age (active years since PhD)Deductible time (months)AbstractProject descriptionSustainability significanceRelevance to WISE

EnergyCircularityClimateDiscovery

Participating researchersSelected publicationsKeywordsBudget (MSEK)Ethics considerationsCV file placeholderAppendix file placeholder

Current mock-call assumption

Uploads are still represented as filenames. Access control and file storage remain future backend work.

The form is read-only unless the current persona is the applicant.

Open chair workspace